Best Open-Source Amplitude Alternatives (2026)
14 self-hostable, open-source projects that replace Amplitude — without expensive once you outgrow the free tier. Each is scored for how hard it is to self-host, with one-click deploy options where they exist.
Amplitude's free tier is generous until your event volume grows, then pricing scales sharply and the useful retention/behavioral features sit behind paid plans. Teams also leave to keep raw event data and PII on their own infrastructure instead of shipping it to a third-party cloud.

Our picks at a glance
At difficulty 4/5 it is the lowest-effort of the three and ships with a straightforward Docker Compose deploy.
It is the only all-in-one here, bundling product analytics, session replay, feature flags, and A/B testing in one platform.
It offers official managed (cloud) hosting and is the most feature-complete, so the hosted tier replaces Amplitude most directly.
Compare all 14 alternatives
Tap a column header to sort| Project | Deploy | Managed | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PostHog Python | 37k ★ | 5/5 Advanced | Docker Compose Kubernetes +1 | MIT | 3 days ago | Repo | |
Postiz Docker | 34k ★ | 3/5 Moderate | Docker Docker Compose +1 | AGPL-3.0 | 3 days ago | Repo | |
Netron Python | 33k ★ | 1/5 Effortless | Manual | MIT | 4 days ago | Repo | |
| 21k ★ | 2/5 Easy | Docker Manual | GPL-2.0 | 10 days ago | Repo | ||
Druid Java | 14k ★ | 5/5 Advanced | Docker Docker Compose +2 | Apache-2.0 | 3 days ago | Repo | |
OpenReplay TypeScript | 12k ★ | 5/5 Advanced | Kubernetes Docker Compose +1 | Apache-2.0 | 3 days ago | Repo | |
Countly JavaScript | 5.9k ★ | 4/5 Involved | Docker Compose Manual | AGPL-3.0 | 3 days ago | Repo | |
RudderStack Docker | 4.5k ★ | 3/5 Moderate | Docker Docker Compose +1 | Elastic-2.0 | 3 days ago | Repo | |
Vince Go | 2k ★ | 2/5 Easy | Docker Manual | AGPL-3.0 | 11 months ago | Repo | |
Aptabase Docker | 1.8k ★ | 3/5 Moderate | Docker Docker Compose | AGPL-3.0 | 3 days ago | Repo | |
Middleware Docker | 1.6k ★ | 3/5 Moderate | Docker Docker Compose | Apache-2.0 | 1 month ago | Repo | |
Swetrix JavaScript | 1.1k ★ | 3/5 Moderate | Docker Docker Compose | AGPL-3.0 | 4 days ago | Repo | |
Cabin JavaScript | 800 ★ | 2/5 Easy | Docker Manual | MIT | 2 months ago | Repo | |
| 127 ★ | 3/5 Moderate | Docker Docker Compose | AGPL-3.0 | 5 months ago | Repo |
What to look for: Decide whether you need just product analytics or the full stack (session replay, feature flags, experiments) in one place, because that determines how heavy the deployment is. All three options here are event-pipeline systems, so budget for the database/ingestion load and confirm the managed tier exists if you don't want to run ClickHouse or similar yourself.
The alternatives, reviewed
- #1
PostHogSelf-host: AdvancedAll-in-one product analytics, session replay, feature flags, and A/B testing
37k Python MIT 3 days agoHow it compares to Amplitude
- Self-hosting the full ClickHouse + Kafka + Postgres + Redis stack is heavy; the project actively steers smaller users toward PostHog Cloud.
- Some enterprise features live under a separate proprietary
eelicense, not pure MIT. - The all-in-one breadth means it is more complex to operate than a focused tool like Mixpanel.
- #2
PostizSelf-host: ModerateSelf-hosted social media scheduling and analytics platform for all major networks
34k Docker AGPL-3.0 3 days agoHow it compares to Amplitude
- Inbox/engagement management (replying to comments and DMs) is limited compared to Hootsuite or Sprout Social
- Social listening and brand mention monitoring are not included
- Detailed competitor analysis and benchmarking features are absent
- Some platform integrations require individual developer app approvals
- #3
NetronSelf-host: EffortlessInteractive visualizer for neural network and machine learning model graphs
33k Python MIT 4 days agoHow it compares to Amplitude
- Purely a model visualization tool; no runtime analytics, dashboards, or event tracking
- Does not replace web or product analytics SaaS in any meaningful way
- No team collaboration or sharing features beyond exporting images
- No support for real-time or streaming model inference monitoring
- #4
GoAccessSelf-host: EasyReal-time web log analyzer with terminal and browser-based interactive dashboards
21k C GPL-2.0 10 days agoHow it compares to Amplitude
- Analyzes server logs only; no JavaScript snippet for client-side event or user-behavior tracking
- No user session recording, heatmaps, or funnel analysis
- No retention, cohort, or A/B test reporting
- Historical trend analysis is limited to what the log files contain
- #5
DruidSelf-host: AdvancedDistributed, column-oriented real-time analytics data store for high-throughput queries
14k Java Apache-2.0 3 days agoHow it compares to Amplitude
- No built-in session analytics, funnel analysis, or retention cohorts compared to Mixpanel/Amplitude
- Requires significant infrastructure knowledge (ZooKeeper, deep-storage, coordinator/broker/historical nodes)
- No out-of-the-box user-facing dashboarding — must pair with Superset or Grafana
- Operational cost and cluster management overhead is very high for small teams
- #6
OpenReplaySelf-host: AdvancedSelf-hosted session replay and product analytics for web apps
12k TypeScript Apache-2.0 3 days agoHow it compares to Amplitude
- Self-hosting requires a Kubernetes-based multi-service stack; resource-hungry and complex to operate.
- Product-analytics features (funnels, cohorts) are less mature than Amplitude/Mixpanel.
- No traditional aggregate web-analytics dashboard; it is session-centric.
- #7
CountlySelf-host: InvolvedPrivacy-first product analytics for web, mobile, and desktop apps
5.9k JavaScript AGPL-3.0 3 days agoHow it compares to Amplitude
- Many advanced features (push notifications, A/B testing, some drill plugins) are reserved for the paid Enterprise Edition.
- The Community Edition documentation and upgrade path can be rough.
- UI and query speed lag behind ClickHouse-backed competitors at large scale.
- #8
RudderStackSelf-host: ModerateOpen-source customer data platform to collect, route, and transform event data
4.5k Docker Elastic-2.0 3 days agoHow it compares to Amplitude
- Elastic-2.0 license prohibits offering RudderStack as a managed service to third parties
- The self-hosted control plane UI is limited; some advanced audience and reverse-ETL features require cloud tier
- Requires Postgres + message queue to be provisioned and managed separately
- Documentation for self-hosting advanced features (transformations, live events debugger) is sparse
- #9
VinceSelf-host: EasyLightweight, privacy-first web analytics dashboard — single binary, no external deps
2k Go AGPL-3.0 11 months agoHow it compares to Amplitude
- No heatmaps, session recordings, or user-level event streams
- Smaller destination ecosystem — no built-in integrations with ad platforms or CRMs
- Community is small; plugin/extension ecosystem is essentially nonexistent
- No multi-site team management or SSO in the self-hosted build
- #10
AptabaseSelf-host: ModeratePrivacy-first, open-source analytics for mobile and desktop apps
1.8k Docker AGPL-3.0 3 days agoHow it compares to Amplitude
- No funnel, retention, or cohort analysis out of the box
- Limited to event-based tracking; no session replay or heatmaps
- Smaller SDK ecosystem compared to Firebase Analytics or Mixpanel
- Self-hosted version may lag behind the cloud product in features
- #11
MiddlewareSelf-host: ModerateEngineering analytics platform that measures team effectiveness via DORA metrics
1.6k Docker Apache-2.0 1 month agoHow it compares to Amplitude
- Focused exclusively on engineering metrics; not a general-purpose product or user analytics tool
- Integration list is limited to Git hosting platforms and Jira — no PagerDuty or incident-management connectors yet
- Trend and benchmark data requires a sufficiently long history of merged PRs to be meaningful
- No alerting or notification system for metric regressions
- #12
SwetrixSelf-host: ModerateOpen-source alternative to Google Analytics with custom events and funnels
1.1k JavaScript AGPL-3.0 4 days agoHow it compares to Amplitude
- ClickHouse is required; no SQLite fallback for small deployments
- Session replay not yet available in the self-hosted build
- Documentation for self-hosting is less mature than for the managed service
- #13
CabinSelf-host: EasyCarbon-aware, privacy-respecting web analytics for the climate-conscious
800 JavaScript MIT 2 months agoHow it compares to Amplitude
- Minimal real-time view; data updates on a delay
- No user-level session replay or heatmaps
- Limited integrations compared to commercial tools
- #14
Prisme AnalyticsSelf-host: ModerateEvent-stream analytics built on ClickHouse for developer teams
127 Go AGPL-3.0 5 months agoHow it compares to Amplitude
- No no-code dashboard builder; requires SQL knowledge for custom reports
- ClickHouse dependency increases minimum infrastructure footprint
- No session replay, heatmaps, or A/B testing modules
The verdict
PostHog is the closest one-for-one Amplitude replacement: it matches the product-analytics core and adds replay, flags, and experiments, with both self-host and a managed cloud. Pick Countly if you specifically want a lighter, easier deployment.
Amplitude alternatives — frequently asked questions
What is the best open-source alternative to Amplitude?
PostHog is the most direct fit. It covers Amplitude's product-analytics features and also bundles session replay, feature flags, and A/B testing, is MIT-licensed, and offers both self-hosting and managed cloud.
Is there a free self-hosted Amplitude alternative?
Yes. PostHog (MIT), OpenReplay (Apache-2.0), and Countly (AGPL-3.0) are all free to self-host. PostHog and OpenReplay run on Kubernetes or Docker Compose; Countly runs on Docker Compose.
Which Amplitude alternative is easiest to self-host?
Countly, at difficulty 4/5, is the easiest of the three and deploys with Docker Compose. PostHog and OpenReplay are both rated 5/5 because of their heavier multi-service architecture.
Do any of these offer hosted (managed) plans so I don't have to run servers?
Yes, all three (PostHog, OpenReplay, and Countly) offer an official managed hosting option, so you can start in the cloud and move to self-hosting later if you want full data ownership.
I want session replay, not just charts. Which should I pick?
PostHog and OpenReplay both include session replay; OpenReplay is replay-first. PostHog adds product analytics, flags, and experiments around it, while OpenReplay focuses on replay plus analytics for web apps.
Which is the most privacy-focused option?
Countly markets itself as privacy-first analytics for web, mobile, and desktop and is AGPL-3.0. Self-hosting any of the three already keeps event data on your own infrastructure rather than Amplitude's cloud.