Best Open-Source Acuity Scheduling Alternatives (2026)
17 self-hostable, open-source projects that replace Acuity Scheduling — without monthly subscriptions per calendar. Each is scored for how hard it is to self-host, with one-click deploy options where they exist.
Acuity bills a monthly subscription per calendar and locks more advanced booking features into higher tiers, which adds up for multi-provider businesses, and it ties you into the Squarespace ecosystem. Self-hosting removes the recurring per-calendar fee and keeps client records, appointment history, and intake data under your own control.

Our picks at a glance
Both are 3/5, but Cal.com adds a One-Click deploy option that lowers setup friction over a manual install.
Far broader feature set, integrations, and API, plus a much larger ecosystem to extend booking workflows.
Provides an official managed cloud (managed:yes); Easy!Appointments is self-host only.
Compare all 17 alternatives
Tap a column header to sort| Project | Deploy | Managed | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cal.com TypeScript | 47k ★ | 3/5 Moderate | One-Click Docker +2 | AGPL-3.0 | 8 days ago | Repo | |
Cal.diy Nodejs | 47k ★ | 3/5 Moderate | Docker Docker Compose +1 | MIT | 8 days ago | Repo | |
QloApps PHP | 14k ★ | 4/5 Involved | Docker Manual | OSL-3.0 | 20 days ago | Repo | |
Radicale Python | 4.9k ★ | 2/5 Easy | Docker Manual | GPL-3.0 | 11 days ago | Repo | |
Fider Docker | 4.4k ★ | 3/5 Moderate | Docker Docker Compose +1 | MIT | 5 days ago | Repo | |
| 4.3k ★ | 3/5 Moderate | Docker Docker Compose +1 | GPL-3.0 | 6 days ago | Repo | ||
Hi.Events Docker | 3.9k ★ | 3/5 Moderate | Docker Docker Compose +1 | AGPL-3.0 | 4 days ago | Repo | |
Baïkal PHP | 3.2k ★ | 3/5 Moderate | Docker Manual | GPL-3.0 | 17 days ago | Repo | |
pretix Python | 2.5k ★ | 3/5 Moderate | Docker Docker Compose +1 | Apache-2.0 | 3 days ago | Repo | |
Indico Python | 2.1k ★ | 4/5 Involved | Docker Docker Compose +1 | MIT | 4 days ago | Repo | |
SabreDAV PHP | 1.7k ★ | 5/5 Advanced | Manual | MIT | 15 days ago | Repo | |
Bracket Docker | 1.7k ★ | 3/5 Moderate | Docker Docker Compose +1 | AGPL-3.0 | 3 days ago | Repo | |
Schej Vue | 1.7k ★ | 2/5 Easy | Docker Compose Manual | MIT | 29 days ago | Repo | |
Alf.io Java | 1.6k ★ | 4/5 Involved | Docker Docker Compose +1 | GPL-3.0 | 4 days ago | Repo | |
Zcal TypeScript | 1.2k ★ | 2/5 Easy | Docker Compose Manual | MIT | 4 months ago | Repo | |
| 1.2k ★ | 2/5 Easy | Docker Docker Compose +1 | AGPL-3.0 | 3 days ago | Repo | ||
OpenSlots PHP | 400 ★ | 2/5 Easy | Manual Docker | MIT | 9 months ago | Repo |
What to look for: For appointment-style booking you need provider and service management, working-hours and buffer rules, and reliable calendar sync and reminders. Decide whether you want a developer-extensible scheduling platform (Cal.com) or a focused service-business booking app with built-in provider/service models (Easy!Appointments).
The alternatives, reviewed
- #1
Cal.comSelf-host: ModerateScheduling infrastructure for everyone, the open-source Calendly alternative
47k TypeScript AGPL-3.0 8 days agoHow it compares to Acuity Scheduling
- Some enterprise features (e.g. SAML SSO, advanced admin/insights, certain platform features) are gated behind a commercial/EE license even when self-hosting.
- Self-hosting requires PostgreSQL plus configuring numerous environment variables and OAuth credentials for calendar integrations.
- The core code is AGPL-3.0, which imposes copyleft obligations on modified network deployments.
- Upgrades between major versions occasionally require manual database migration work.
- #2
Cal.diySelf-host: ModerateOpen-source online appointment scheduling built on Cal.com
47k Nodejs MIT 8 days agoHow it compares to Acuity Scheduling
- Self-hosted setup requires configuring PostgreSQL, email/SMTP, and OAuth providers
- Enterprise features (SAML SSO, workflows at scale, analytics) are cloud-only or require an enterprise license
- Payment collection integrations need additional third-party setup
- Admin UI for multi-tenant management is less polished than Calendly's hosted offering
- #3
QloAppsSelf-host: InvolvedOpen-source hotel reservation and channel management system
14k PHP OSL-3.0 20 days agoHow it compares to Acuity Scheduling
- Scope is hotel-specific; not a general-purpose appointment scheduler
- Channel manager integrations (OTA sync) are limited compared to commercial PMS solutions
- Mobile app for guests/staff is absent out of the box
- PrestaShop heritage makes theming and customisation non-trivial
- #4
RadicaleSelf-host: EasyLightweight CalDAV and CardDAV server with minimal configuration
4.9k Python GPL-3.0 11 days agoHow it compares to Acuity Scheduling
- No web-based calendar UI; clients must use a CalDAV-compatible app (Thunderbird, Apple Calendar, etc.)
- Not a booking/scheduling tool; no public booking pages or availability sharing like Calendly
- Scaling beyond a handful of users is not a design goal
- Lacks push notifications; relies on client polling
- #5
FiderSelf-host: ModerateOpen platform to collect, vote on, and prioritise user feedback
4.4k Docker MIT 5 days agoHow it compares to Acuity Scheduling
- categorySlug is 'scheduling' but Fider is a feedback/voting tool; replaces options are limited to scheduling slugs in the ref
- No roadmap visualisation or timeline planning built in
- Integrations with Jira, Linear, or Slack require custom webhooks
- No in-app surveys or NPS measurement
- #6
Easy!AppointmentsSelf-host: ModerateSelf-hosted appointment scheduler for service businesses with provider and service management
4.3k PHP GPL-3.0 6 days agoHow it compares to Acuity Scheduling
- No built-in payment collection at booking time, unlike Acuity/Calendly paid tiers.
- Calendar sync is limited to Google Calendar; no native Outlook/Office 365 or CalDAV support.
- The UI and admin experience feel dated compared to commercial products.
- Lacks advanced features like automated reminder workflows, packages/memberships, and intake form logic found in Acuity.
- #7
Hi.EventsSelf-host: ModerateSelf-hosted event management and ticketing for any scale
3.9k Docker AGPL-3.0 4 days agoHow it compares to Acuity Scheduling
- Payment gateway support is limited to Stripe; no PayPal or regional gateways out of the box
- No recurring event / subscription ticketing support
- Email marketing and attendee re-engagement tools are minimal
- Mobile check-in app is not available; badge printing requires third-party tools
- #8
BaïkalSelf-host: ModerateLightweight CalDAV and CardDAV server based on sabre/dav
3.2k PHP GPL-3.0 17 days agoHow it compares to Acuity Scheduling
- No web-based calendar or scheduling UI for end users; requires a CalDAV client app
- No public booking page or availability-sharing feature comparable to Calendly
- Development activity has slowed; some sabre/dav edge cases may go unpatched
- HTTPS and reverse-proxy setup is manual and not guided
- #9
pretixSelf-host: ModerateOpen-source ticket sales and event registration platform for any scale
2.5k Python Apache-2.0 3 days agoHow it compares to Acuity Scheduling
- Steeper setup curve than simple booking tools
- No built-in one-on-one appointment scheduling workflow
- Mobile app for organizers is Android/iOS only, not PWA
- #10
IndicoSelf-host: InvolvedCERN's open-source event and conference management platform
2.1k Python MIT 4 days agoHow it compares to Acuity Scheduling
- Overpowered for simple one-on-one appointment booking
- Setup involves multiple services (Redis, PostgreSQL, Celery) and is complex
- UI design is functional but dated compared to modern booking tools
- #11
SabreDAVSelf-host: AdvancedOpen-source CardDAV, CalDAV, and WebDAV framework for PHP
1.7k PHP MIT 15 days agoHow it compares to Acuity Scheduling
- A developer framework, not an end-user product; requires significant custom PHP development
- No admin UI, booking pages, or user-facing features out of the box
- Documentation assumes solid PHP and WebDAV protocol knowledge
- Not a drop-in replacement for any SaaS scheduling tool without substantial build effort
- #12
BracketSelf-host: ModerateFlexible self-hosted tournament management with live public rankings
1.7k Docker AGPL-3.0 3 days agoHow it compares to Acuity Scheduling
- No built-in calendar integration or iCal/Google Calendar sync for match schedules
- Payment collection for entry fees is absent
- Email or SMS notifications to participants are not supported out of the box
- Limited reporting and export options compared to dedicated event-management SaaS
- #13
SchejSelf-host: EasyWhen2meet-style group availability finder you can self-host
1.7k Vue MIT 29 days agoHow it compares to Acuity Scheduling
- No calendar integration — availability is marked manually
- No booking confirmation or email reminders
- Limited to group poll-style scheduling, not one-on-one booking pages
- #14
Alf.ioSelf-host: InvolvedOpen-source ticket reservation platform for events of any size
1.6k Java GPL-3.0 4 days agoHow it compares to Acuity Scheduling
- No built-in recurring appointment booking (1:1 scheduling like Calendly)
- Mobile app for attendees is not provided; check-in relies on a separate web view
- Analytics and post-event reporting are basic compared to Eventbrite or Cvent
- Initial Java/PostgreSQL setup is heavier than typical SaaS onboarding
- #15
ZcalSelf-host: EasyBeautiful open-source scheduling page and availability management tool
1.2k TypeScript MIT 4 months agoHow it compares to Acuity Scheduling
- Fewer calendar integrations than Cal.com
- No team scheduling or round-robin features
- Limited workflow automation (no reminders or follow-ups)
- #16
Nextcloud CalendarSelf-host: EasyFull-featured CalDAV calendar server built into Nextcloud with sharing and scheduling
1.2k PHP AGPL-3.0 3 days agoHow it compares to Acuity Scheduling
- No native public booking-page flow (requires a third-party plugin)
- Video conferencing integration is limited compared to Calendly
- Mobile app experience is less polished than hosted alternatives
- #17
OpenSlotsSelf-host: EasyMinimalist appointment slot booking system with email confirmation
400 PHP MIT 9 months agoHow it compares to Acuity Scheduling
- No recurring appointment or subscription booking support
- Email notifications only — no SMS or push
- No calendar sync (Google/Apple/Outlook)
The verdict
Cal.com is the strongest overall Acuity replacement thanks to its feature depth, managed-cloud option, and active community. If you run a service business and want a lighter, purpose-built tool with native provider and service management, Easy!Appointments is the focused alternative.
Acuity Scheduling alternatives — frequently asked questions
What is the best open-source Acuity Scheduling alternative?
Cal.com for breadth and Easy!Appointments for service-business booking. Cal.com (AGPL-3.0, ~36,000 stars) offers the most features and a managed cloud; Easy!Appointments (GPL-3.0) is built around providers and services.
Is there a free self-hosted alternative to Acuity?
Yes. Both Cal.com and Easy!Appointments are open source and free to self-host, removing Acuity's per-calendar monthly subscription.
Which alternative is best for a salon or clinic with multiple providers?
Easy!Appointments is designed for exactly that, with built-in provider and service management for service businesses. Cal.com also handles multi-person scheduling via teams and round-robin.
Which is easier to self-host, Cal.com or Easy!Appointments?
Both are rated 3/5 difficulty. Cal.com edges ahead because it offers a One-Click deploy in addition to Docker and manual installation.
Do I need Squarespace to use these like Acuity?
No. Both Cal.com and Easy!Appointments are standalone and self-hosted, so you avoid the Squarespace ecosystem entirely and keep your booking data on your own server.
Is there a hosted version if I don't want to manage a server?
Cal.com offers an official managed cloud (managed:yes), so you can use it without self-hosting. Easy!Appointments is self-host only.