Plane vs Tracks
| Tagline | Open-source issue tracking, sprints, and roadmaps - a Jira and Linear alternative | GTD-based task manager implementing Getting Things Done methodology |
| Category | Project Management & Kanban | Project Management & Kanban |
| Replaces | Jira, Linear, Asana | Asana, Trello, Basecamp |
| GitHub stars | 52k | 1.1k |
| Language | TypeScript | Ruby |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 3/5 Moderate | 3/5 Moderate |
| Deploy options | Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes Manual | Docker Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | 5 days ago | 1 month ago |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Plane
- Some advanced features (e.g. certain enterprise workflows, intake, advanced analytics) are gated behind the paid Pro/Enterprise tiers
- Self-hosted community edition lags behind the cloud version on newer features
- Automation rules are far less mature than Jira's
- Mobile apps are less polished than Linear's
Tracks
- Single-user focused; collaboration features are minimal
- No Kanban board or Gantt chart view
- Development pace is slow; community is small
Bottom line
Both are a similar lift to self-host; choose Plane for the larger community and ecosystem. Plane has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Plane
Open-source issue tracking, sprints, and roadmaps - a Jira and Linear alternative