Plane vs PLANKA
| Tagline | Open-source issue tracking, sprints, and roadmaps - a Jira and Linear alternative | Elegant real-time kanban board built for teams, a clean Trello alternative |
| Category | Project Management & Kanban | Project Management & Kanban |
| Replaces | Jira, Linear, Asana | Trello |
| GitHub stars | 59k | 13k |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 3/5 Moderate | 3/5 Moderate |
| Deploy options | Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes Manual | Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | 2 days ago | 2 days ago |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Plane
- Some advanced features (e.g. certain enterprise workflows, intake, advanced analytics) are gated behind the paid Pro/Enterprise tiers
- Self-hosted community edition lags behind the cloud version on newer features
- Automation rules are far less mature than Jira's
- Mobile apps are less polished than Linear's
PLANKA
- Newer versions moved to a fair-use license with Pro/Enterprise tiers for some features
- Fewer features than Trello (no power-ups, limited automation)
- No official mobile apps
- No managed cloud offering from the core project
Bottom line
Both are a similar lift to self-host; choose Plane for the larger community and ecosystem. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Plane
Open-source issue tracking, sprints, and roadmaps - a Jira and Linear alternative