Submit

Best Open-Source Netflix Alternatives (2026)

8 self-hostable, open-source projects that replace Netflix — without rising prices and a catalog that changes under you. Each is scored for how hard it is to self-host, with one-click deploy options where they exist.

Compare all 8 alternatives

ProjectDeployManagedLicense
Jellyfin
C#
53k ★
2/5
Easy
Docker
Docker Compose
+1
GPL-2.0yesterdayRepo
Kodi
C++
21k ★
2/5
Easy
Manual
GPL-2.0todayRepo
Invidious
Docker
20k ★
3/5
Moderate
Docker
Docker Compose
+1
AGPL-3.03 days agoRepo
PeerTube
Nodejs
15k ★
4/5
Involved
Docker
Manual
AGPL-3.0yesterdayRepo
Sonarr
C#
14k ★
3/5
Moderate
Docker
Docker Compose
+1
GPL-3.04 days agoRepo
MeTube
Python
14k ★
2/5
Easy
Docker
Docker Compose
AGPL-3.0todayRepo
Radarr
C#
14k ★
3/5
Moderate
Docker
Docker Compose
+1
GPL-3.08 days agoRepo
Tube Archivist
Docker
8.1k ★
3/5
Moderate
Docker
Docker Compose
GPL-3.026 days agoRepo
Head-to-head:Jellyfin vs NetflixKodi vs NetflixInvidious vs NetflixPeerTube vs NetflixSonarr vs Netflix

The alternatives, reviewed

  1. #1
    Jellyfin
    Self-host: Easy

    Free open-source media server — a self-hosted Plex alternative

    53k C# GPL-2.0 yesterday
    How it compares to Netflix
    • No official cloud/managed hosting option; you must run and maintain your own server.
    • Hardware transcoding setup can be complex, requiring manual GPU passthrough configuration.
    • Plugin ecosystem is smaller and less polished than Plex's mature marketplace.
    • Lacks Plex's global CDN-backed streaming relay for remote access without port forwarding.
    RepoDetails & deploy →
  2. #2
    Kodi
    Self-host: Easy

    Open-source home theater media center for local and network playback

    21k C++ GPL-2.0 today
    How it compares to Netflix
    • Kodi is a local client, not a server; remote streaming to other devices requires additional setup (e.g., Kodi's built-in UPnP or a separate server).
    • No native mobile apps with full feature parity; mobile clients are limited.
    • Addon quality is highly variable and addons can break without notice.
    • Modern UI/UX is dated compared to Plex or Netflix-style interfaces.
    RepoDetails & deploy →
  3. #3
    Invidious
    Self-host: Moderate

    Privacy-respecting alternative front-end for YouTube

    20k Docker AGPL-3.0 3 days ago
    How it compares to Netflix
    • Relies entirely on YouTube's infrastructure; Google can and does throttle or break the API at any time.
    • No support for YouTube Shorts, YouTube Music, or YouTube Premium content.
    • Comment loading and search quality degrade as Google tightens API restrictions.
    • No upload capability; purely a viewing front-end.
    RepoDetails & deploy →
  4. #4
    PeerTube
    Self-host: Involved

    Federated, P2P-powered open-source video hosting platform

    15k Nodejs AGPL-3.0 yesterday
    How it compares to Netflix
    • Server setup is complex, requiring PostgreSQL, Redis, Node.js, and nginx; no official Docker Compose for production.
    • P2P seeding can expose viewer IP addresses unless a proxy mode is enabled.
    • No recommendation algorithm; content discovery is limited across the federated network.
    • Monetization and subscription/paywall features are absent or rudimentary.
    RepoDetails & deploy →
  5. #5
    Sonarr
    Self-host: Moderate

    Automatic TV show download manager for Usenet and BitTorrent

    14k C# GPL-3.0 4 days ago
    How it compares to Netflix
    • Requires separate download client, indexer, and media server; not a standalone solution.
    • No built-in content streaming or playback; purely a download manager.
    • Initial configuration of indexers, profiles, and download paths has a steep learning curve.
    • Dependent on availability of content on Usenet or torrent trackers, which is not guaranteed.
    RepoDetails & deploy →
  6. #6
    MeTube
    Self-host: Easy

    Web GUI for yt-dlp — download videos from YouTube and hundreds of other sites

    14k Python AGPL-3.0 today
    How it compares to Netflix
    • Downloads files locally; does not stream or manage a media library.
    • No scheduling or automatic monitoring of channels/playlists for new content.
    • No user authentication by default; must be secured behind a reverse proxy.
    • Subject to yt-dlp breakage whenever platforms change their APIs.
    RepoDetails & deploy →
  7. #7
    Radarr
    Self-host: Moderate

    Automatic movie download manager for Usenet and BitTorrent

    14k C# GPL-3.0 8 days ago
    How it compares to Netflix
    • Requires a separate download client and indexer; not a standalone media solution.
    • No built-in playback; must be paired with Jellyfin, Plex, or Kodi.
    • Content availability depends entirely on third-party indexers and trackers.
    • Initial setup and fine-tuning of quality profiles requires significant manual effort.
    RepoDetails & deploy →
  8. #8
    Tube Archivist
    Self-host: Moderate

    Self-hosted YouTube archive with search, metadata indexing, and a clean UI

    8.1k Docker GPL-3.0 26 days ago
    How it compares to Netflix
    • Requires Elasticsearch, which is memory-intensive (1 GB+ RAM minimum).
    • No transcoding; playback quality depends on the downloaded file format.
    • Cannot stream live YouTube content; archive-only.
    • No multi-user access control beyond a basic admin/user split.
    RepoDetails & deploy →
Still deciding? Compare Jellyfin vs Kodi side by side →

Keep exploring

All Media Servers & Streaming →Self-hosted directory →Easiest to self-host →
Plex alternativesSpotify alternatives