Plane vs Tuleap
| Tagline | Open-source issue tracking, sprints, and roadmaps - a Jira and Linear alternative | Enterprise-grade ALM platform with Scrum, Kanban, and Git hosting |
| Category | Project Management & Kanban | Project Management & Kanban |
| Replaces | Jira, Linear, Asana | Jira, GitLab, Asana |
| GitHub stars | 52k | 1k |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 3/5 Moderate | 4/5 Involved |
| Deploy options | Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes Manual | Docker Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | 5 days ago | 1 month ago |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Plane
- Some advanced features (e.g. certain enterprise workflows, intake, advanced analytics) are gated behind the paid Pro/Enterprise tiers
- Self-hosted community edition lags behind the cloud version on newer features
- Automation rules are far less mature than Jira's
- Mobile apps are less polished than Linear's
Tuleap
- Complex initial setup; enterprise focus means steep learning curve
- Some advanced features (portfolio management, SAFe) require paid Enterprise Edition
- UI is dense and dated compared to modern SaaS alternatives
Bottom line
Choose Plane if you want the lower-effort setup; choose Plane for the larger community and ecosystem. Plane has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Plane
Open-source issue tracking, sprints, and roadmaps - a Jira and Linear alternative