OpenProject vs Plane
| Tagline | Enterprise-grade open-source project management with Gantt, agile boards, and budgeting | Open-source issue tracking, sprints, and roadmaps - a Jira and Linear alternative |
| Category | Project Management & Kanban | Project Management & Kanban |
| Replaces | Jira, Asana, Basecamp | Jira, Linear, Asana |
| GitHub stars | 16k | 59k |
| Language | Ruby | TypeScript |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 3/5 Moderate | 3/5 Moderate |
| Deploy options | One-Click Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes Manual | Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | yesterday | 2 days ago |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
OpenProject
- Many premium modules (team planner, baselines, SSO, custom fields beyond limits) require the paid Enterprise edition
- UI feels heavier and less modern than Linear or Notion
- Ruby/PostgreSQL stack is resource-hungry for small teams
- No native mobile apps
Plane
- Some advanced features (e.g. certain enterprise workflows, intake, advanced analytics) are gated behind the paid Pro/Enterprise tiers
- Self-hosted community edition lags behind the cloud version on newer features
- Automation rules are far less mature than Jira's
- Mobile apps are less polished than Linear's
Bottom line
Both are a similar lift to self-host; choose Plane for the larger community and ecosystem. OpenProject has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
OpenProject
Enterprise-grade open-source project management with Gantt, agile boards, and budgeting
Plane
Open-source issue tracking, sprints, and roadmaps - a Jira and Linear alternative