Infisical vs Teampass
| Tagline | Open-source secrets management platform for developers and teams | On-premise collaborative password manager for teams |
| Category | Password Managers & Secrets | Password Managers & Secrets |
| Replaces | HashiCorp Vault | LastPass, 1Password, Dashlane |
| GitHub stars | 29k | 1.8k |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 3/5 Moderate | 4/5 Involved |
| Deploy options | Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes Manual | Docker Docker Compose Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | yesterday | 2 days ago |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Infisical
- Core is MIT but a number of features live under an enterprise (ee) license requiring a paid plan
- Less battle-tested than Vault for low-level cryptographic/dynamic-secret workloads
- Self-hosted instances do not include all features available in the paid cloud tier
- Smaller plugin/integration catalog than HashiCorp Vault
Teampass
- Dated UI and UX compared to modern commercial managers
- Manual setup (LAMP stack, MySQL, PHP extensions) can be error-prone; security depends on correct server hardening
- No first-party mobile apps; browser/web focused
- Historically has had security-audit concerns; requires careful, up-to-date deployment
Bottom line
Choose Infisical if you want the lower-effort setup; choose Infisical for the larger community and ecosystem. Infisical has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.