Haraka vs listmonk
| Tagline | Fast, highly extensible event-driven SMTP server in Node.js | High-performance self-hosted newsletter and mailing list manager |
| Category | Email & Newsletters | Email & Newsletters |
| Replaces | SendGrid | Mailchimp, ConvertKit (Kit), SendGrid |
| GitHub stars | 5.6k | 22k |
| Language | JavaScript | Go |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 4/5 Involved | 3/5 Moderate |
| Deploy options | Docker Manual | Docker Docker Compose Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | 8 days ago | 5 days ago |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Haraka
- Low-level MTA — no web UI, dashboards, or campaign tooling
- Requires writing/configuring plugins for real-world setups
- No built-in analytics, tracking, or template management
- Deliverability and reputation management are entirely on you
listmonk
- No built-in marketing automation/journey builder like Mailchimp
- No bundled deliverability/IP reputation management — you supply your own SMTP/SES
- No native landing page or e-commerce/CRM integrations
- Reporting and analytics are basic compared to commercial suites
Bottom line
Choose listmonk if you want the lower-effort setup; choose listmonk for the larger community and ecosystem. listmonk has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.