Ghost vs Squidex
| Tagline | Modern open-source publishing platform for blogs and newsletters | Headless CMS built on MongoDB with CQRS event sourcing |
| Category | Blogging & CMS | Blogging & CMS |
| Replaces | Substack, Medium, WordPress.com | Contentful, WordPress.com, Medium |
| GitHub stars | 54k | 2.5k |
| Language | Nodejs | .NET |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Self-host difficulty | 3/5 Moderate | 3/5 Moderate |
| Deploy options | Docker Docker Compose Manual | Docker Docker Compose Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | today | 2 days ago |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Ghost
- Membership and newsletter features require Stripe integration for paid tiers
- Plugin/theme ecosystem is much smaller than WordPress
- No built-in e-commerce beyond memberships and paid newsletters
- Self-hosted email delivery needs a transactional email provider (Mailgun, Postmark) configured separately
Squidex
- MongoDB dependency increases operational complexity vs. SQL-based headless CMSes
- .NET stack means fewer hosting providers with native support compared to Node/PHP tools
- UI and developer experience are less polished than Contentful or Sanity
- Plugin/extension ecosystem is minimal; most customization requires code changes
Bottom line
Both are a similar lift to self-host; choose Ghost for the larger community and ecosystem. Ghost has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.