Firefly III vs Wallos
| Tagline | Self-hosted personal finance manager with budgets, rules, and bank import | Lightweight self-hosted personal subscription tracker with statistics |
| Category | Finance & Budgeting | Finance & Budgeting |
| Replaces | Mint, YNAB, QuickBooks | Mint, YNAB |
| GitHub stars | 24k | 8.1k |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 3/5 Moderate | 2/5 Easy |
| Deploy options | Docker Docker Compose Manual | Docker Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | today | 5 days ago |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Firefly III
- Bank import requires a separate importer container and CSV/OFX manipulation; no one-click bank sync
- UI can feel complex and verbose for casual users compared to Mint's simplicity
- No built-in mobile app; third-party apps exist but vary in quality
- Investment and brokerage account tracking is limited compared to dedicated wealth tools
Wallos
- No bank/account sync; subscriptions must be entered manually
- No general budgeting categories or spending envelopes like YNAB
- Reporting is limited to subscription totals — no net-worth or cash-flow views
- No mobile native app; mobile access is browser-only
Bottom line
Choose Wallos if you want the lower-effort setup; choose Firefly III for the larger community and ecosystem. Firefly III has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Firefly III
Self-hosted personal finance manager with budgets, rules, and bank import