Atomic CRM vs Odoo (CRM)
| Tagline | Full-featured CRM built with React and Supabase | Open-source ERP suite whose CRM app rivals Salesforce and HubSpot |
| Category | CRM & Sales | CRM & Sales |
| Replaces | Pipedrive, Salesforce | Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive |
| GitHub stars | 1.3k | 54k |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 3/5 Moderate | 4/5 Involved |
| Deploy options | Docker Manual | Docker Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | yesterday | yesterday |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Atomic CRM
- Positioned as a customizable starter, not a turnkey product
- Depends on Supabase, adding an external dependency
- Lacks marketing automation, telephony, and advanced reporting
- Small community and limited out-of-the-box integrations
Odoo (CRM)
- Many polished features (advanced CRM tooling) push you toward the paid Enterprise edition
- Community Edition UI and modules are deliberately limited
- Self-hosting the full stack is heavy and complex
- Upgrades between major versions can be painful
Bottom line
Choose Atomic CRM if you want the lower-effort setup; choose Odoo (CRM) for the larger community and ecosystem. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.