Pydio Cells vs Syncthing
| Tagline | Self-hosted document sharing and collaboration platform for the enterprise | Continuous peer-to-peer file synchronization between your own devices |
| Category | File Storage & Sync | File Storage & Sync |
| Replaces | Dropbox, Box, Google Drive | Dropbox, Google Drive |
| GitHub stars | 2.2k | 89k |
| Language | Go | Go |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 4/5 Involved | 2/5 Easy |
| Deploy options | Docker Docker Compose Manual | Docker Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | yesterday | yesterday |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Pydio Cells
- Smaller community and ecosystem than Nextcloud/Seafile
- Some enterprise capabilities are gated behind the paid Cells Enterprise edition
- Microservices architecture makes setup and troubleshooting more complex than simpler apps
- Office/document co-editing relies on external integrations
Syncthing
- Pure peer-to-peer sync: no cloud copy, so files only exist where a device is online (no always-available server unless you run one)
- No web file browser, sharing links, or per-file access control like Dropbox
- No built-in versioning UI beyond simple file versioning options
- Not designed for multi-user team sharing; it's device-to-device for one owner
Bottom line
Choose Syncthing if you want the lower-effort setup; choose Syncthing for the larger community and ecosystem. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Pydio Cells
Self-hosted document sharing and collaboration platform for the enterprise