ProjectSend vs Super Productivity
| Tagline | Self-hosted file sharing and client collaboration platform for agencies | Advanced to-do app with timeboxing, time tracking, and Jira/GitHub integrations |
| Category | Project Management & Kanban | Project Management & Kanban |
| Replaces | Basecamp, Trello | Asana, Trello, monday.com |
| GitHub stars | 2k | 22k |
| Language | PHP | Docker |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Self-host difficulty | 2/5 Simple | 2/5 Simple |
| Deploy options | Docker Manual | Docker Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | 4 days ago | yesterday |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
ProjectSend
- Focused on file delivery, not full task or sprint management
- No native Kanban, time tracking, or roadmap features
- UI is functional but basic
Super Productivity
- No multi-user collaboration or team workspace; primarily single-user
- Board/Gantt chart views common in Asana or Monday.com are absent
- Reporting and analytics are limited to personal time logs
- No built-in file attachments or rich document editing on tasks
Bottom line
Both are a similar lift to self-host; choose Super Productivity for the larger community and ecosystem. Super Productivity has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
ProjectSend
Self-hosted file sharing and client collaboration platform for agencies
Super Productivity
Advanced to-do app with timeboxing, time tracking, and Jira/GitHub integrations