Pirsch vs Postiz
| Tagline | Cookie-free server-side analytics with a clean Go-based architecture | Self-hosted social media scheduling and analytics platform for all major networks |
| Category | Product & Web Analytics | Product & Web Analytics |
| Replaces | Google Analytics, Mixpanel | Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Amplitude |
| GitHub stars | 1.2k | 32k |
| Language | Go | Docker |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 3/5 Moderate | 3/5 Moderate |
| Deploy options | Docker Manual | Docker Docker Compose Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | 1 month ago | 5 days ago |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Pirsch
- ClickHouse dependency raises the infrastructure bar considerably
- No built-in session replay or heatmap features
- Team/org management requires the commercial SaaS tier
Postiz
- Inbox/engagement management (replying to comments and DMs) is limited compared to Hootsuite or Sprout Social
- Social listening and brand mention monitoring are not included
- Detailed competitor analysis and benchmarking features are absent
- Some platform integrations require individual developer app approvals
Bottom line
Both are a similar lift to self-host; choose Postiz for the larger community and ecosystem. Postiz has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Postiz
Self-hosted social media scheduling and analytics platform for all major networks