OrangeScrum vs Super Productivity
| Tagline | Agile project management tool with Scrum and Kanban boards | Advanced to-do app with timeboxing, time tracking, and Jira/GitHub integrations |
| Category | Project Management & Kanban | Project Management & Kanban |
| Replaces | Jira, Trello, Asana | Asana, Trello, monday.com |
| GitHub stars | 800 | 22k |
| Language | PHP | Docker |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Self-host difficulty | 3/5 Moderate | 2/5 Simple |
| Deploy options | Docker Manual | Docker Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | 4 months ago | yesterday |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
OrangeScrum
- Many premium features locked behind paid plans
- Gantt charts only available in paid tiers
- Community edition sees slower feature updates than cloud version
Super Productivity
- No multi-user collaboration or team workspace; primarily single-user
- Board/Gantt chart views common in Asana or Monday.com are absent
- Reporting and analytics are limited to personal time logs
- No built-in file attachments or rich document editing on tasks
Bottom line
Choose Super Productivity if you want the lower-effort setup; choose Super Productivity for the larger community and ecosystem. Super Productivity has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Super Productivity
Advanced to-do app with timeboxing, time tracking, and Jira/GitHub integrations