OpenProject vs ProjectSend
| Tagline | Enterprise-grade open-source project management with Gantt, agile boards, and budgeting | Self-hosted file sharing and client collaboration platform for agencies |
| Category | Project Management & Kanban | Project Management & Kanban |
| Replaces | Jira, Asana, Basecamp | Basecamp, Trello |
| GitHub stars | 16k | 2k |
| Language | Ruby | PHP |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 3/5 Moderate | 2/5 Simple |
| Deploy options | One-Click Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes Manual | Docker Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | yesterday | 4 days ago |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
OpenProject
- Many premium modules (team planner, baselines, SSO, custom fields beyond limits) require the paid Enterprise edition
- UI feels heavier and less modern than Linear or Notion
- Ruby/PostgreSQL stack is resource-hungry for small teams
- No native mobile apps
ProjectSend
- Focused on file delivery, not full task or sprint management
- No native Kanban, time tracking, or roadmap features
- UI is functional but basic
Bottom line
Choose ProjectSend if you want the lower-effort setup; choose OpenProject for the larger community and ecosystem. OpenProject has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
OpenProject
Enterprise-grade open-source project management with Gantt, agile boards, and budgeting
ProjectSend
Self-hosted file sharing and client collaboration platform for agencies