ITFlow vs Super Productivity
| Tagline | Open-source IT documentation and ticketing for MSPs and IT teams | Advanced to-do app with timeboxing, time tracking, and Jira/GitHub integrations |
| Category | Project Management & Kanban | Project Management & Kanban |
| Replaces | Jira, Asana, monday.com | Asana, Trello, monday.com |
| GitHub stars | 1k | 22k |
| Language | PHP | Docker |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Self-host difficulty | 2/5 Simple | 2/5 Simple |
| Deploy options | Docker Manual | Docker Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | 7 days ago | yesterday |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
ITFlow
- Heavily MSP-focused; less suited for pure software development teams
- No Agile sprint planning or velocity tracking
- Still maturing; some features are incomplete
Super Productivity
- No multi-user collaboration or team workspace; primarily single-user
- Board/Gantt chart views common in Asana or Monday.com are absent
- Reporting and analytics are limited to personal time logs
- No built-in file attachments or rich document editing on tasks
Bottom line
Both are a similar lift to self-host; choose Super Productivity for the larger community and ecosystem. Super Productivity has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Super Productivity
Advanced to-do app with timeboxing, time tracking, and Jira/GitHub integrations