ILLA Builder vs Supabase
| Tagline | Open-source low-code builder for internal tools, a self-hostable Retool alternative | Open-source Firebase alternative built on PostgreSQL with realtime and auth |
| Category | Databases & Spreadsheets | Databases & Spreadsheets |
| Replaces | Retool | Airtable, Google Sheets, Retool |
| GitHub stars | 12k | 109k |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 3/5 Moderate | 3/5 Moderate |
| Deploy options | Docker Docker Compose Manual | Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | 3 months ago | yesterday |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
ILLA Builder
- Development has slowed; releases and commits are infrequent.
- Smaller connector catalog and ecosystem than Retool.
- Fewer advanced governance/enterprise features.
- Documentation and community support lag behind larger alternatives.
Supabase
- Self-hosted Docker Compose stack is complex: 8+ services including Kong, GoTrue, PostgREST, Realtime
- Studio table editor is less polished than Airtable UX for non-technical users
- Edge Functions are limited to Deno; no Node.js runtime in the self-hosted edition
Bottom line
Both are a similar lift to self-host; choose Supabase for the larger community and ecosystem. Supabase has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
ILLA Builder
Open-source low-code builder for internal tools, a self-hostable Retool alternative
Supabase
Open-source Firebase alternative built on PostgreSQL with realtime and auth