Huly vs tududi
| Tagline | All-in-one project management, tracker, and team collaboration - a Linear/Jira alternative | Hierarchical task manager with smart recurring tasks and Telegram integration |
| Category | Project Management & Kanban | Project Management & Kanban |
| Replaces | Linear, Jira, Slack | Asana, Trello, monday.com |
| GitHub stars | 26k | 3k |
| Language | TypeScript | Docker |
| License | EPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Self-host difficulty | 4/5 Involved | 2/5 Easy |
| Deploy options | Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes Manual | Docker Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | today | yesterday |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Huly
- Self-hosting the full multi-service architecture (MongoDB, MinIO, Elastic, transactors) is complex
- Documentation for self-hosting is sparse relative to its breadth
- Breadth over depth: individual modules are less mature than dedicated tools like Linear or Slack
- Self-hosted edition trails the managed cloud on some features
tududi
- Single-user focused; no team collaboration or permission management
- No board or Gantt views; primarily a list-based task interface
- Integrations are limited to Telegram; no native sync with GitHub, Jira, or calendars
- Mobile app is absent; Telegram bot is the primary mobile interaction method
Bottom line
Choose tududi if you want the lower-effort setup; choose Huly for the larger community and ecosystem. Huly has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.