Huly vs Kaneo
| Tagline | All-in-one project management, tracker, and team collaboration - a Linear/Jira alternative | Simple and efficient project management platform focused on clean UX |
| Category | Project Management & Kanban | Project Management & Kanban |
| Replaces | Linear, Jira, Slack | Trello, Asana, Linear |
| GitHub stars | 26k | 3.7k |
| Language | TypeScript | K8S |
| License | EPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Self-host difficulty | 4/5 Involved | 4/5 Involved |
| Deploy options | Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes Manual | Kubernetes Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | today | 4 days ago |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Huly
- Self-hosting the full multi-service architecture (MongoDB, MinIO, Elastic, transactors) is complex
- Documentation for self-hosting is sparse relative to its breadth
- Breadth over depth: individual modules are less mature than dedicated tools like Linear or Slack
- Self-hosted edition trails the managed cloud on some features
Kaneo
- Feature set is early-stage; lacks advanced views like Gantt, timeline, or calendar
- No native integrations with developer tools (GitHub, GitLab, Jira)
- Time tracking and reporting capabilities are not present
- Primary deployment target is Kubernetes, which raises the barrier for smaller teams
Bottom line
Both are a similar lift to self-host; choose Huly for the larger community and ecosystem. Huly has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Huly
All-in-one project management, tracker, and team collaboration - a Linear/Jira alternative