Grafana vs Homepage by gethomepage
| Tagline | Observability and analytics dashboards for metrics, logs, and time series | Highly customizable application dashboard with Docker and service API integrations |
| Category | BI & Dashboards | BI & Dashboards |
| Replaces | Tableau, Power BI, Datadog | Tableau, Looker, Power BI |
| GitHub stars | 74k | 31k |
| Language | TypeScript | Docker |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 2/5 Easy | 2/5 Easy |
| Deploy options | One-Click Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes Manual | Docker Docker Compose Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | today | 3 days ago |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Grafana
- Oriented toward time-series and observability, not ad-hoc business analytics or pivot-style exploration
- No business-friendly visual query builder; dashboards assume knowledge of data sources and query languages
- Weak at relational/tabular BI reporting compared to Tableau or Power BI
- No semantic modeling layer; data modeling lives in the underlying sources
Homepage by gethomepage
- No analytics, charting, or data visualization beyond service status widgets
- No multi-user authentication or role-based access control
- Configuration is file-only; no web-based GUI for editing
- No alerting or notification system for service downtime
Bottom line
Both are a similar lift to self-host; choose Grafana for the larger community and ecosystem. Grafana has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Homepage by gethomepage
Highly customizable application dashboard with Docker and service API integrations