Gogs vs tududi
| Tagline | Minimal painless self-hosted Git service written in Go | Hierarchical task manager with smart recurring tasks and Telegram integration |
| Category | Project Management & Kanban | Project Management & Kanban |
| Replaces | Jira, Linear, Trello | Asana, Trello, monday.com |
| GitHub stars | 48k | 3k |
| Language | Go | Docker |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Self-host difficulty | 2/5 Easy | 2/5 Easy |
| Deploy options | Docker Manual | Docker Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | 2 days ago | yesterday |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Gogs
- No built-in CI/CD pipeline; relies on webhooks to external systems
- Code review and pull-request functionality is basic compared to GitHub or Gitea
- Plugin/extension ecosystem is very limited
- Development pace is slower than Gitea; some features lag behind by years
tududi
- Single-user focused; no team collaboration or permission management
- No board or Gantt views; primarily a list-based task interface
- Integrations are limited to Telegram; no native sync with GitHub, Jira, or calendars
- Mobile app is absent; Telegram bot is the primary mobile interaction method
Bottom line
Both are a similar lift to self-host; choose Gogs for the larger community and ecosystem. tududi has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
tududi
Hierarchical task manager with smart recurring tasks and Telegram integration