Gitea vs Super Productivity
| Tagline | Painless self-hosted Git service with code review, CI/CD, and package registry | Advanced to-do app with timeboxing, time tracking, and Jira/GitHub integrations |
| Category | Project Management & Kanban | Project Management & Kanban |
| Replaces | Jira, Linear, Trello | Asana, Trello, monday.com |
| GitHub stars | 56k | 20k |
| Language | Go | Docker |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Self-host difficulty | 2/5 Easy | 2/5 Easy |
| Deploy options | Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes Manual | Docker Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | today | today |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Gitea
- Advanced Jira-style sprint planning, roadmaps, and velocity charts are absent
- No native real-time pair-programming or live collaboration tools
- Gitea Actions ecosystem is smaller than GitHub Actions; fewer third-party action integrations
- Enterprise SSO (SAML, advanced LDAP group sync) requires extra configuration effort
Super Productivity
- No multi-user collaboration or team workspace; primarily single-user
- Board/Gantt chart views common in Asana or Monday.com are absent
- Reporting and analytics are limited to personal time logs
- No built-in file attachments or rich document editing on tasks
Bottom line
Both are a similar lift to self-host; choose Gitea for the larger community and ecosystem. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Gitea
Painless self-hosted Git service with code review, CI/CD, and package registry
Super Productivity
Advanced to-do app with timeboxing, time tracking, and Jira/GitHub integrations