Gitea vs Kaneo
| Tagline | Painless self-hosted Git service with code review, CI/CD, and package registry | Simple and efficient project management platform focused on clean UX |
| Category | Project Management & Kanban | Project Management & Kanban |
| Replaces | GitHub, GitLab, Jira | Trello, Asana, Linear |
| GitHub stars | 58k | 9.1k |
| Language | Go | K8S |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Self-host difficulty | 2/5 Easy | 4/5 Involved |
| Deploy options | Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes Manual | Kubernetes Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | yesterday | yesterday |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Gitea
- Advanced Jira-style sprint planning, roadmaps, and velocity charts are absent
- No native real-time pair-programming or live collaboration tools
- Gitea Actions ecosystem is smaller than GitHub Actions; fewer third-party action integrations
- Enterprise SSO (SAML, advanced LDAP group sync) requires extra configuration effort
Kaneo
- Feature set is early-stage; lacks advanced views like Gantt, timeline, or calendar
- No native integrations with developer tools (GitHub, GitLab, Jira)
- Time tracking and reporting capabilities are not present
- Primary deployment target is Kubernetes, which raises the barrier for smaller teams
Bottom line
Choose Gitea if you want the lower-effort setup; choose Gitea for the larger community and ecosystem. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Gitea
Painless self-hosted Git service with code review, CI/CD, and package registry