Getform vs OpnForm
| Tagline | Lightweight form backend that receives HTML form submissions without backend code | Open-source form builder to create forms and surveys without code |
| Category | Forms & Surveys | Forms & Surveys |
| Replaces | Jotform, Typeform | Typeform, Google Forms, Jotform |
| GitHub stars | 180 | 3.6k |
| Language | Python | PHP |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 2/5 Easy | 3/5 Moderate |
| Deploy options | Docker Manual | One-Click Docker Docker Compose Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | 2 months ago | yesterday |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Getform
- No built-in form builder; developers must write their own HTML forms
- Limited response analytics compared to full-featured form platforms
- Community self-hosted version lacks some features of the commercial cloud product
OpnForm
- Some features (e.g. advanced branding removal, certain integrations) are reserved for the paid/cloud tier
- Fewer templates and question types than Jotform
- Analytics and reporting are lighter than commercial offerings
- Self-hosting requires a Laravel/PHP + database stack to maintain
Bottom line
Choose Getform if you want the lower-effort setup; choose OpnForm for the larger community and ecosystem. OpnForm has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Getform
Lightweight form backend that receives HTML form submissions without backend code