Gatus vs SigNoz
| Tagline | Developer-oriented health dashboard with declarative YAML config and status pages | Open-source APM and observability for metrics, traces, and logs in one app |
| Category | Monitoring & Status Pages | Monitoring & Status Pages |
| Replaces | UptimeRobot, Statuspage, Pingdom | Datadog |
| GitHub stars | 12k | 32k |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Self-host difficulty | 2/5 Easy | 3/5 Moderate |
| Deploy options | Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes Manual | Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | 5 days ago | 3 days ago |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Gatus
- Configuration is YAML-only; no UI to add/edit monitors (less friendly than UptimeRobot's dashboard)
- Status pages are basic compared to Statuspage.io (no incident timeline workflow, subscriber management, or component grouping UX)
- No built-in multi-region probing without running multiple instances
- Limited historical analytics / long-term reporting
SigNoz
- Runs a heavier stack (ClickHouse + OTel collector + multiple services), needing more resources than lightweight monitors
- Some advanced features and SSO are reserved for the cloud/enterprise tier
- No public status page or simple uptime checks like UptimeRobot
- Younger ecosystem than Datadog; fewer turnkey integrations
Bottom line
Choose Gatus if you want the lower-effort setup; choose SigNoz for the larger community and ecosystem. SigNoz has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Gatus
Developer-oriented health dashboard with declarative YAML config and status pages