Firefly III vs Sure
| Tagline | Self-hosted personal finance manager with budgets, rules, and bank import | Personal finance app for everyone — a maintained fork of Maybe |
| Category | Finance & Budgeting | Finance & Budgeting |
| Replaces | Mint, YNAB, QuickBooks | Mint, YNAB |
| GitHub stars | 24k | 8.7k |
| Language | PHP | Docker |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 3/5 Moderate | 3/5 Moderate |
| Deploy options | Docker Docker Compose Manual | Docker Docker Compose Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | today | today |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Firefly III
- Bank import requires a separate importer container and CSV/OFX manipulation; no one-click bank sync
- UI can feel complex and verbose for casual users compared to Mint's simplicity
- No built-in mobile app; third-party apps exist but vary in quality
- Investment and brokerage account tracking is limited compared to dedicated wealth tools
Sure
- Community fork with a smaller contributor base; long-term maintenance cadence is uncertain
- Bank connection / Plaid integration requires API credentials and is US-centric
- No mobile native app; web-only interface
- Budgeting and envelope features less developed compared to YNAB or Actual
Bottom line
Both are a similar lift to self-host; choose Firefly III for the larger community and ecosystem. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Firefly III
Self-hosted personal finance manager with budgets, rules, and bank import