Ever Gauzy vs Gitea
| Tagline | Open business management platform: ERP, CRM, HRM, ATS, and project management | Painless self-hosted Git service with code review, CI/CD, and package registry |
| Category | Project Management & Kanban | Project Management & Kanban |
| Replaces | Jira, Asana, monday.com | Jira, Linear, Trello |
| GitHub stars | 3.7k | 56k |
| Language | Docker | Go |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Self-host difficulty | 4/5 Involved | 2/5 Easy |
| Deploy options | Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes Manual | Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | today | today |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Ever Gauzy
- High setup complexity; the full stack requires multiple services and significant configuration
- Documentation and onboarding guides are incomplete in areas
- UI polish and UX refinement lag behind mature SaaS tools like Jira or Monday
- Community and plugin ecosystem are small relative to the breadth of features promised
Gitea
- Advanced Jira-style sprint planning, roadmaps, and velocity charts are absent
- No native real-time pair-programming or live collaboration tools
- Gitea Actions ecosystem is smaller than GitHub Actions; fewer third-party action integrations
- Enterprise SSO (SAML, advanced LDAP group sync) requires extra configuration effort
Bottom line
Choose Gitea if you want the lower-effort setup; choose Gitea for the larger community and ecosystem. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Ever Gauzy
Open business management platform: ERP, CRM, HRM, ATS, and project management
Gitea
Painless self-hosted Git service with code review, CI/CD, and package registry