erxes vs Monica
| Tagline | Open-source experience operating system unifying sales, marketing and support | Personal CRM to remember important details about your contacts |
| Category | CRM & Sales | CRM & Sales |
| Replaces | HubSpot, Salesforce, Intercom | HubSpot, Pipedrive |
| GitHub stars | 4k | 25k |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 5/5 Advanced | 3/5 Moderate |
| Deploy options | Docker Docker Compose Kubernetes Manual | Docker Docker Compose Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | 2 days ago | 3 months ago |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
erxes
- Microservice/plugin architecture makes self-hosting complex and resource-heavy
- Broad scope means individual modules are less deep than specialized tools
- Documentation can lag the fast-moving codebase
- Smaller integration ecosystem than HubSpot
Monica
- Designed for personal use only; lacks sales pipeline management, forecasting, and team collaboration
- No built-in email marketing, lead scoring, or workflow automation
- REST API coverage is limited compared to business-grade CRM platforms
Bottom line
Choose Monica if you want the lower-effort setup; choose Monica for the larger community and ecosystem. erxes has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
erxes
Open-source experience operating system unifying sales, marketing and support