Dokploy vs go-doxy
| Tagline | Self-hosted PaaS to deploy apps and databases with Docker and Traefik | Lightweight Go reverse proxy with WebUI, Docker integration, and auto container sleep |
| Category | Self-Hosting Platforms & PaaS | Self-Hosting Platforms & PaaS |
| Replaces | Heroku, Vercel, Netlify, Render | Netlify, Vercel, Render |
| GitHub stars | 37k | 4.2k |
| Language | TypeScript | Docker |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Self-host difficulty | 2/5 Easy | 2/5 Easy |
| Deploy options | Docker Docker Compose Manual | Docker Docker Compose Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | 4 days ago | 5 days ago |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Dokploy
- Licensing has proprietary portions (not fully permissive for all uses), unlike a pure OSS PaaS.
- No managed edge CDN or global anycast network; you supply the infrastructure.
- Relies on Docker Swarm, which is less actively developed than Kubernetes for large-scale orchestration.
- Observability and team/RBAC features are thinner than commercial platforms.
go-doxy
- No CI/CD or git integration; purely a runtime reverse proxy, not a deployment platform.
- No build pipeline, static site hosting, or serverless function support.
- Ecosystem maturity and documentation are much thinner than Traefik or managed alternatives.
- No global CDN or multi-region routing.
Bottom line
Both are a similar lift to self-host; choose Dokploy for the larger community and ecosystem. Dokploy has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
go-doxy
Lightweight Go reverse proxy with WebUI, Docker integration, and auto container sleep