CraftCMS vs Strapi
| Tagline | Content-first CMS crafted for developers and editors | Leading open-source headless CMS with flexible API and content type builder |
| Category | Blogging & CMS | Blogging & CMS |
| Replaces | Contentful, WordPress.com, Squarespace | Contentful, WordPress.com |
| GitHub stars | 3.6k | 72k |
| Language | PHP | Nodejs |
| License | ⊘ Proprietary | MIT |
| Self-host difficulty | 3/5 Moderate | 3/5 Moderate |
| Deploy options | Docker Manual | Docker Docker Compose Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | today | today |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
CraftCMS
- Commercial license required for multi-user and team workflows; cost can exceed SaaS alternatives
- Plugin ecosystem is strong but most premium plugins are paid
- No built-in e-commerce; requires the separate paid Craft Commerce plugin
- Headless GraphQL API is behind a Pro license paywall
Strapi
- No built-in front-end rendering; requires a separate frontend framework
- Media asset transformation (image resizing, CDN) requires third-party providers
- Workflow and editorial approval features are less mature than Contentful
- Self-hosted upgrades between major versions can require manual migration steps
Bottom line
Both are a similar lift to self-host; choose Strapi for the larger community and ecosystem. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Strapi
Leading open-source headless CMS with flexible API and content type builder