Countly vs Postiz
| Tagline | Privacy-first product analytics for web, mobile, and desktop apps | Self-hosted social media scheduling and analytics platform for all major networks |
| Category | Product & Web Analytics | Product & Web Analytics |
| Replaces | Mixpanel, Amplitude | Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Amplitude |
| GitHub stars | 5.9k | 34k |
| Language | JavaScript | Docker |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 4/5 Involved | 3/5 Moderate |
| Deploy options | Docker Compose Manual | Docker Docker Compose Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | 2 days ago | 2 days ago |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Countly
- Many advanced features (push notifications, A/B testing, some drill plugins) are reserved for the paid Enterprise Edition.
- The Community Edition documentation and upgrade path can be rough.
- UI and query speed lag behind ClickHouse-backed competitors at large scale.
Postiz
- Inbox/engagement management (replying to comments and DMs) is limited compared to Hootsuite or Sprout Social
- Social listening and brand mention monitoring are not included
- Detailed competitor analysis and benchmarking features are absent
- Some platform integrations require individual developer app approvals
Bottom line
Choose Postiz if you want the lower-effort setup; choose Postiz for the larger community and ecosystem. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Postiz
Self-hosted social media scheduling and analytics platform for all major networks