Counter vs Postiz
| Tagline | Minimalist self-hosted hit counter and page-view tracker | Self-hosted social media scheduling and analytics platform for all major networks |
| Category | Product & Web Analytics | Product & Web Analytics |
| Replaces | Google Analytics, Hotjar | Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Amplitude |
| GitHub stars | 2k | 32k |
| Language | Go | Docker |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 1/5 Effortless | 3/5 Moderate |
| Deploy options | One-Click Docker Manual | Docker Docker Compose Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | 1 month ago | 5 days ago |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Counter
- No funnel, cohort, or retention analysis whatsoever
- No custom event tracking beyond page hits
- Data aggregation is coarse; no drill-down by browser, OS, or campaign
Postiz
- Inbox/engagement management (replying to comments and DMs) is limited compared to Hootsuite or Sprout Social
- Social listening and brand mention monitoring are not included
- Detailed competitor analysis and benchmarking features are absent
- Some platform integrations require individual developer app approvals
Bottom line
Choose Counter if you want the lower-effort setup; choose Postiz for the larger community and ecosystem. Postiz has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.
Postiz
Self-hosted social media scheduling and analytics platform for all major networks