Box vs SeaweedFS
Thinking of swapping Box for the open-source SeaweedFS? Here’s the honest trade-off.
33k Go Apache-2.0 2 days ago
What you give up vs Box
- Storage infrastructure, not an end-user product: no consumer sync app, sharing UI, or collaboration
- Requires assembling master/volume/filer components and a frontend to behave like Dropbox
- Steeper operational knowledge needed for distributed deployment and tuning
- Documentation assumes infrastructure familiarity
What you gain
- • Full data ownership — self-host SeaweedFS on your own infrastructure.
- • No per-seat SaaS bill (Box: enterprise per-user pricing).
- • Open-source code you can audit and extend (Apache-2.0).