Atomic CRM vs Monica
| Tagline | Full-featured CRM built with React and Supabase | Personal CRM to remember important details about your contacts |
| Category | CRM & Sales | CRM & Sales |
| Replaces | Pipedrive, Salesforce | HubSpot, Pipedrive |
| GitHub stars | 1.2k | 25k |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Self-host difficulty | 3/5 Moderate | 3/5 Moderate |
| Deploy options | Docker Manual | Docker Docker Compose Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | 2 days ago | 3 months ago |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Atomic CRM
- Positioned as a customizable starter, not a turnkey product
- Depends on Supabase, adding an external dependency
- Lacks marketing automation, telephony, and advanced reporting
- Small community and limited out-of-the-box integrations
Monica
- Designed for personal use only; lacks sales pipeline management, forecasting, and team collaboration
- No built-in email marketing, lead scoring, or workflow automation
- REST API coverage is limited compared to business-grade CRM platforms
Bottom line
Both are a similar lift to self-host; choose Monica for the larger community and ecosystem. Atomic CRM has seen more recent development. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.