Atomic CRM vs Krayin CRM
| Tagline | Full-featured CRM built with React and Supabase | Free and open-source Laravel CRM for the full customer lifecycle |
| Category | CRM & Sales | CRM & Sales |
| Replaces | Pipedrive, Salesforce | Pipedrive, HubSpot, Salesforce |
| GitHub stars | 1.3k | 24k |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Self-host difficulty | 3/5 Moderate | 4/5 Involved |
| Deploy options | Docker Manual | Docker Manual |
| Managed hosting | ||
| Last updated | yesterday | yesterday |
| View repo | View repo |
Where each falls short
The honest trade-offs — what you give up with each, versus the proprietary tools they replace.
Atomic CRM
- Positioned as a customizable starter, not a turnkey product
- Depends on Supabase, adding an external dependency
- Lacks marketing automation, telephony, and advanced reporting
- Small community and limited out-of-the-box integrations
Krayin CRM
- Feature set is narrower than HubSpot/Salesforce (limited marketing automation)
- Reporting and analytics are basic
- Smaller plugin/marketplace ecosystem
- Some advanced modules are sold separately as commercial add-ons
Bottom line
Choose Atomic CRM if you want the lower-effort setup; choose Krayin CRM for the larger community and ecosystem. Open each guide below for deploy steps and the full feature gap.